This is probably going to be a quick one because I don’t think I have to say much about it. This comes from a video over on Paulogia’s channel, where Seth Andrews makes a point at the very beginning and then it launches into a discussion.
Unfortunately, if you just change “Christian Nationalist” to “progressive” in his statement, it still means the same thing. So I’m going to link to the video below and will quote what Seth said, but it’s amazing just how self-unaware these people are. They’re all doing the exact same things! Continue reading They Still Can’t Look in the Mirror→
Back again with another political claim by the progressives which sounds good on paper, but we know that they don’t really mean it. Experience has taught us never to trust politicians and that is especially true here. If they really wanted what they say they want, they’d try to get ALL money taken out of it, not only the other side’s. So let’s get into it. Continue reading I Hate Progressives Part 17→
We’re into the next part now and it hasn’t really made a difference. None of these progressive talking points meet the rational smell test and certainly not the honesty version. I know that the far left is not honest, they have proven it time and time again, so we’re going to revisit that today and I’ll show why I don’t accept their rhetoric. I want a party that I can trust and I don’t think any of those exist. Continue reading I Hate Progressives Part 16→
We’ve come to part 3, “Taking on systems that privilege the wealthy and powerful to demand a government and economy that works for the people.” Except the left doesn’t care about the people. They are only pushing their agenda and screw everyone else. This is a 5-part section, so I don’t expect it to take very long, but I’m reasonably sure I won’t agree with any of it. Let’s see. Continue reading I Hate Progressives Part 15→
I had another short discussion with someone on Reddit, who was claiming that philosophical concepts that are true can be defensible with science. His example, of course, was morality and he was trying to use Sam Harris’ Moral Landscape as his defense.
Welcome back to the next part of “I Hate Progressives!” The longer this series goes on, the more obvious it becomes to me that the far left has a ton of problems and is really, identical to the far-right. Both sides want control. Both sides want loyalty. Neither has the best interests of the actual people in mind.
Here we go again with another stupid idea from the house of stupid ideas, the political left. This isn’t a surprise and hasn’t been for a long time, except to the people who can’t think, they can only feel. Honestly, the left are every bit as bad as the far right and for the same reasons. They just want to believe!
This is really just stupid. Last month, my oldest daughter turned 27. She doesn’t even live in the state and now, she’s too old to be on our insurance. Neither of my daughters live here, so my wife hopped on the insurance website to remove them both. It says on the website that removing beneficiaries will have no effect whatsoever on your coverage.
We’re still doing it. I figure we might be half-way through the overall list, maybe a little less. This is the second point from the second section, of which there are four sections, but the first one was very long, which is why this is taking so long. I haven’t found a single one that I have agreed with yet. So let’s see if this is where the progressives turn the corner.
/cdn.vox-cdn.com/uploads/chorus_image/image/63709522/baby_in_mirror.0.1537578188.0.jpg)
This is probably going to be a quick one because I don’t think I have to say much about it. This comes from a video over on Paulogia’s channel, where Seth Andrews makes a point at the very beginning and then it launches into a discussion.
Back again with another political claim by the progressives which sounds good on paper, but we know that they don’t really mean it. Experience has taught us never to trust politicians and that is especially true here. If they really wanted what they say they want, they’d try to get ALL money taken out of it, not only the other side’s. So let’s get into it. 
So this morning, someone posted on a woodworking forum on Reddit, asking about women and alphabet soup orientation woodworkers on YouTube.
I had another short discussion with someone on Reddit, who was claiming that philosophical concepts that are true can be defensible with science. His example, of course, was morality and he was trying to use Sam Harris’ Moral Landscape as his defense.
This is really just stupid. Last month, my oldest daughter turned 27. She doesn’t even live in the state and now, she’s too old to be on our insurance. Neither of my daughters live here, so my wife hopped on the insurance website to remove them both. It says on the website that removing beneficiaries will have no effect whatsoever on your coverage.